Up to index of Isabelle/HOL/HOL-Complex/CSP/CSP_T/CSP_F
theory CSP_F_domain(*-------------------------------------------* | CSP-Prover on Isabelle2004 | | December 2004 | | June 2005 (modified) | | August 2005 (modified) | | | | CSP-Prover on Isabelle2005 | | October 2005 (modified) | | April 2006 (modified) | | March 2007 (modified) | | August 2007 (modified) | | | | Yoshinao Isobe (AIST JAPAN) | *-------------------------------------------*) theory CSP_F_domain imports CSP_T_traces CSP_F_failures begin (* The following simplification rules are deleted in this theory file *) (* because they unexpectly rewrite UnionT and InterT. *) (* disj_not1: (~ P | Q) = (P --> Q) *) declare disj_not1 [simp del] (********************************************************* domF *********************************************************) (*--------------------------------* | STOP | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma STOP_T2 : "HC_T2 (traces(STOP) (fstF o M), failures(STOP) M)" by (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) (* F3 *) lemma STOP_F3 : "HC_F3 (traces(STOP) (fstF o M), failures(STOP) M)" by (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) (* T3_F4 *) lemma STOP_T3_F4 : "HC_T3_F4 (traces(STOP) (fstF o M), failures(STOP) M)" by (auto simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) (*** STOP_domF ***) lemma STOP_domF : "(traces(STOP) (fstF o M), failures(STOP) M) : domF" apply (simp add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: STOP_T2) apply (simp add: STOP_F3) apply (simp add: STOP_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | SKIP | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma SKIP_T2 : "HC_T2 (traces(SKIP) (fstF o M), failures(SKIP) M)" by (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) (* F3 *) lemma SKIP_F3 : "HC_F3 (traces(SKIP) (fstF o M), failures(SKIP) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) by (auto simp add: Evset_def) (* T3_F4 *) lemma SKIP_T3_F4 : "HC_T3_F4 (traces(SKIP) (fstF o M), failures(SKIP) M)" by (auto simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) (*** SKIP_domF ***) lemma SKIP_domF : "(traces(SKIP) (fstF o M), failures(SKIP) M) : domF" apply (simp add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: SKIP_T2) apply (simp add: SKIP_F3) apply (simp add: SKIP_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | DIV | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma DIV_T2 : "HC_T2 (traces(DIV) (fstF o M), failures(DIV) M)" by (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) (* F3 *) lemma DIV_F3 : "HC_F3 (traces(DIV) (fstF o M), failures(DIV) M)" by (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) (* T3_F4 *) lemma DIV_T3_F4 : "HC_T3_F4 (traces(DIV) (fstF o M), failures(DIV) M)" by (auto simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) (*** DIV_domF ***) lemma DIV_domF : "(traces(DIV) (fstF o M), failures(DIV) M) : domF" apply (simp add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: DIV_T2) apply (simp add: DIV_F3) apply (simp add: DIV_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Act_prefix | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma Act_prefix_T2 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T2 (traces(a -> P) (fstF o M), failures(a -> P) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE, simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) by (force) (* F3 *) lemma Act_prefix_F3 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_F3 (traces(a -> P) (fstF o M), failures(a -> P) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE disjE, simp) apply (case_tac "Ev a ~: Y", simp) (* show "Ev a : Y --> contradict" *) apply (drule_tac x="Ev a" in spec, simp) apply (drule_tac x="<>" in spec, simp) apply (elim conjE exE, simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="X" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Y" in spec) apply (simp) apply (drule mp) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="aa" in spec, simp) apply (drule_tac x="sa ^^ <aa>" in spec) apply (simp add: appt_assoc) by (simp) (* T3_F4 *) lemma Act_prefix_T3_F4 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(a -> P) (fstF o M), failures(a -> P) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (insert trace_nil_or_Tick_or_Ev) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (erule disjE, simp) (* s ^^ <Tick> = <> --> contradict *) apply (erule disjE, simp) (* s = <> --> contradict *) apply (erule disjE, simp) (* s = <Tick> --> contradict *) apply (elim conjE exE) (* s = [Ev a]t ^^ sb *) apply (simp add: domF_iff HC_T3_F4_def) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (drule_tac x="sb" in spec) apply (simp add: appt_assoc) done (*** Act_prefix_domF ***) lemma Act_prefix_domF : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> (traces(a -> P) (fstF o M), failures(a -> P) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Act_prefix_T2) apply (simp add: Act_prefix_F3) apply (simp add: Act_prefix_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Ext_pre_choice | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma Ext_pre_choice_T2 : "ALL a. (traces(Pf a) (fstF o M), failures(Pf a) M) : domF ==> HC_T2 (traces(? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures(? :X -> Pf) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE, simp) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) by (force) (* F3 *) lemma Ext_pre_choice_F3 : "ALL a. (traces(Pf a) (fstF o M), failures(Pf a) M) : domF ==> HC_F3 (traces(? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures(? :X -> Pf) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE disjE, simp) (* s = <> *) apply (case_tac "EX a. Ev a :Ev ` X Int (Xa Un Y)") (* show contradiction" *) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (drule_tac x="Ev a" in spec) apply (drule mp) apply (simp) (* show "Ev a : Y" *) apply (elim conjE disjE) apply (fast) (* contradict *) apply (simp) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (simp) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (simp) apply (fast) (* contradict *) apply (fast) (* Ev ` X Int (Xa Un Y) = {} *) (* s ~= <> *) apply (elim conjE exE, simp) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Xa" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Y" in spec) apply (simp) apply (drule mp) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="aa" in spec, simp) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="sa ^^ <aa>" in spec) apply (simp add: appt_assoc) by (simp) (* T3_F4 *) lemma Ext_pre_choice_T3_F4 : "ALL a. (traces(Pf a) (fstF o M), failures(Pf a) M) : domF ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures(? :X -> Pf) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (insert trace_nil_or_Tick_or_Ev) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (erule disjE, simp) (* contradict *) apply (erule disjE, simp) (* s = <> --> contradict *) apply (erule disjE, simp) (* s = <Tick> --> contradict *) apply (elim conjE exE) (* s = [Ev aa]t ^^ sb *) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (simp add: domF_iff HC_T3_F4_def) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (drule_tac x="sb" in spec) apply (simp add: appt_assoc) done (*** Ext_pre_choice_domF ***) lemma Ext_pre_choice_domF : "ALL a. (traces(Pf a) (fstF o M), failures(Pf a) M) : domF ==> (traces(? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures(? :X -> Pf) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Ext_pre_choice_T2) apply (simp add: Ext_pre_choice_F3) apply (simp add: Ext_pre_choice_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Ext_choice | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma Ext_choice_T2 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T2 (traces(P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures(P [+] Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) by (fast) (* F3 *) lemma Ext_choice_F3 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_F3 (traces(P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures(P [+] Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE disjE) apply (simp_all add: domF_def HC_F3_def) by (auto simp add: Evset_def) (* T3_F4 *) lemma Ext_choice_T3_F4 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures(P [+] Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp add: domF_iff HC_T3_F4_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) by (auto) (*** Ext_choice_domF ***) lemma Ext_choice_domF : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> (traces(P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures(P [+] Q) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Ext_choice_T2) apply (simp add: Ext_choice_F3) apply (simp add: Ext_choice_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Int_choice | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma Int_choice_T2 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T2 (traces(P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |~| Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) by (auto) (* F3 *) lemma Int_choice_F3 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_F3 (traces(P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |~| Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) by (auto) (* T3_F4 *) lemma Int_choice_T3_F4 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |~| Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (simp add: domF_iff HC_T3_F4_def) by (auto) (*** Int_choice_domF ***) lemma Int_choice_domF : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> (traces(P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |~| Q) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Int_choice_T2) apply (simp add: Int_choice_F3) apply (simp add: Int_choice_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Rep_int_choice | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma Union_proc_T2: "ALL c. (Tf c, Ff c) : domF ==> HC_T2 ({t. t = <> | (EX c:C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. EX c:C. f :f Ff c}f)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def) apply (simp add: in_traces) apply (simp add: in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE bexE exE) apply (rule disjI2) apply (drule_tac x="c" in spec) apply (rule_tac x="c" in bexI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) by (auto) lemma Rep_int_choice_T2 : "ALL c. (traces(Pf c) (fstF o M), failures(Pf c) M) : domF ==> HC_T2 (traces(!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures(!! :C .. Pf) M)" apply (simp add: traces_def failures_def) apply (simp add: Union_proc_T2) done (* F3 *) lemma Union_proc_F3: "ALL c. (Tf c, Ff c) : domF ==> HC_F3 ({t. t = <> | (EX c:C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. EX c:C. f :f Ff c}f)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def) apply (simp add: in_traces) apply (simp add: in_failures) apply (intro allI) apply (intro impI) apply (elim conjE bexE) apply (rule_tac x="c" in bexI) apply (drule_tac x="c" in spec) apply (rule domF_F3) apply (auto) done lemma Rep_int_choice_nat : "ALL c. (traces(Pf c) (fstF o M), failures(Pf c) M) : domF ==> HC_F3 (traces(!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures(!! :C .. Pf) M)" apply (simp add: traces_def failures_def) apply (simp add: Union_proc_F3) done (* T3_F4 *) lemma Union_proc_T3_F4: "ALL c. (Tf c, Ff c) : domF ==> HC_T3_F4 ({t. t = <> | (EX c:C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. EX c:C. f :f Ff c}f)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def) apply (simp add: in_traces) apply (simp add: in_failures) apply (auto) apply (rule_tac x="c" in bexI) apply (rule domF_F4) apply (simp_all) apply (rule_tac x="c" in bexI) apply (rule domF_T3) apply (simp_all) done lemma Rep_int_choice_T3_F4 : "ALL c. (traces(Pf c) (fstF o M), failures(Pf c) M) : domF ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures(!! :C .. Pf) M)" apply (simp add: traces_def failures_def) apply (simp add: Union_proc_T3_F4) done (*** F ***) lemma Union_proc_domF: "ALL c. (Tf c, Ff c) : domF ==> ({t. t = <> | (EX c:C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. EX c:C. f :f Ff c}f) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Union_proc_T2) apply (simp add: Union_proc_F3) apply (simp add: Union_proc_T3_F4) done (*** Rep_int_choice_domF ***) lemma Rep_int_choice_domF : "ALL c. (traces(Pf c) (fstF o M), failures(Pf c) M) : domF ==> (traces(!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures(!! :C .. Pf) M) : domF" apply (simp add: traces_def failures_def) apply (simp add: Union_proc_domF) done (*--------------------------------* | IF | *--------------------------------*) (* T2 *) lemma IF_T2 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T2 (traces(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M)" by (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures domF_def) (* F3 *) lemma IF_F3 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_F3 (traces(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M)" by (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures domF_def) (* T3_F4 *) lemma IF_T3_F4 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M)" by (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures domF_iff) (*** IF_domF ***) lemma IF_domF : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> (traces(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures(IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: IF_T2) apply (simp add: IF_F3) apply (simp add: IF_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Parallel | *--------------------------------*) (*** T2 ***) lemma Parallel_T2 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T2 (traces(P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |[X]| Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="t" in exI) apply (simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (drule mp, rule_tac x="Y" in exI, simp) apply (drule mp, rule_tac x="Z" in exI, simp) by (simp) (*** F3 ***) lemma Parallel_F3_lm1: "X1 Un (X2 Un X3) - X = (X1 - X) Un (X2 - X) Un (X3 - X)" by (auto) lemma Parallel_F3_lm2: "[| X1 = X2 ; Y1 = Y2 |] ==> X1 Un Y1 = X2 Un Y2" by (auto) lemma Parallel_F3 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_F3 (traces(P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |[X]| Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rename_tac u X12 Y X1 X2 s t) (* (u, X12) :f [[P |[X]| Q]]F *) (* (s, X1) :f [[P]]F *) (* (t, X2) :f [[Q]]F *) (* X12 = X1 Un X2 *) apply (rule_tac x= "X1 Un ({a. a : Y & (a = Tick | a : Ev ` X) & s ^^ <a> ~:t traces(P) (fstF o M)} Un {a. a : Y & a ~= Tick & a ~: Ev ` X})" in exI) (* Z1 *) apply (rule_tac x= "X2 Un ({a. a : Y & (a = Tick | a : Ev ` X) & t ^^ <a> ~:t traces(Q) (fstF o M)} Un {a. a : Y & a ~= Tick & a ~: Ev ` X})" in exI) (* Z2 *) apply (subgoal_tac "noTick s & noTick t", simp) apply (rule conjI) (* show X12 Un Y = X1 Un Z1 Un Z2 *) apply (rule equalityI) (* <= *) apply (rule subsetI, simp) apply (erule disjE, simp) apply (erule disjE, simp) apply (simp) apply (drule_tac x="x" in spec, simp) apply (drule_tac x="s ^^ <x>" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="t ^^ <x>" in spec) (* no sync *) apply (case_tac "x ~= Tick & x ~: Ev ` X", simp) (* sync *) apply (simp add: par_tr_last) apply (erule disjE, simp) apply (force) apply (rotate_tac -2) apply (erule disjE, simp) apply (force) apply (simp) apply (force) (* => *) apply (force) apply (rule conjI) (* show X1 Un ... = X2 Un ... *) apply (simp add: Parallel_F3_lm1) apply (rule Parallel_F3_lm2) apply (rule Parallel_F3_lm2) apply (simp) apply (force) apply (simp) (* condition 2 *) apply (rule_tac x="s" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="t" in exI) apply (simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="X1" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="X2" in spec) apply (drule_tac x= "{a. a : Y & (a = Tick | a : Ev ` X) & s ^^ <a> ~:t traces(P) (fstF o M)} Un {a. a : Y & a ~= Tick & a ~: Ev ` X}" in spec) apply (drule_tac x= "{a. a : Y & (a = Tick | a : Ev ` X) & t ^^ <a> ~:t traces(Q) (fstF o M)} Un {a. a : Y & a ~= Tick & a ~: Ev ` X}" in spec) apply (simp) (* left *) apply (drule mp) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec, simp) apply (drule_tac x="s ^^ <a>" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (erule disjE) apply (simp add: par_tr_last) apply (fast) apply (erule disjE, simp) apply (simp add: HC_T2_def) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (force) (* right *) apply (drule mp) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec, simp) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="t ^^ <a>" in spec) apply (erule disjE) apply (simp add: par_tr_last) apply (fast) apply (erule disjE) apply (simp add: HC_T2_def) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (force) apply (simp) apply (simp) (* notick s & notick t *) apply (simp add: par_tr_noTick_decompo) done (* T3_F4 *) lemma Parallel_T3_F4 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |[X]| Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp add: par_tr_last) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rule conjI) (* F4 *) apply (rule_tac x="Evset" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="Evset" in exI) apply (simp) apply (rule_tac x="s'" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="t'" in exI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F4_def) (* T3 *) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac x="Xa" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="Xa" in exI) apply (simp) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="t" in exI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T3_def) apply (fast) done (*** Parallel_domF ***) lemma Parallel_domF : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> (traces(P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures(P |[X]| Q) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Parallel_T2) apply (simp add: Parallel_F3) apply (simp add: Parallel_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Hiding | *--------------------------------*) (*** T2 ***) lemma Hiding_T2 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T2 (traces(P -- X) (fstF o M), failures(P -- X) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) by (force) (*** F3 ***) lemma Hiding_F3 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_F3 (traces(P -- X) (fstF o M), failures(P -- X) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rename_tac t Y Z s) apply (rule_tac x="s" in exI, simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Ev ` X Un Y" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Z - Ev ` X" in spec) apply (simp) apply (drule mp) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (simp) apply (insert event_Tick_or_Ev) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (erule disjE) (* Tick *) apply (drule_tac x="s ^^ <Tick>" in spec) apply (simp) (* Ev *) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (drule_tac x="s ^^ <Ev aa>" in spec) apply (simp) apply (subgoal_tac "aa ~: X", simp_all) apply (force) apply (subgoal_tac "Ev ` X Un Y Un (Z - Ev ` X) = Ev ` X Un (Y Un Z)", simp) by (auto) (* T3_F4 *) lemma Hiding_T3_F4 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(P -- X) (fstF o M), failures(P -- X) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (drule sym) apply (simp add: hide_tr_decompo) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rotate_tac -1) apply (drule sym) apply (subgoal_tac "(EX t''. t' = t'' ^^ <Tick> & sett t'' <= Ev ` X)") apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp) (* F4 *) apply (rule conjI) apply (rule_tac x="s' ^^ t''" in exI) apply (simp) apply (subgoal_tac "t'' --tr X = <>", simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F4_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s' ^^ t''" in spec) apply (subgoal_tac "noTick t''") apply (simp add: appt_assoc) apply (simp add: noTick_def) apply (force) apply (simp add: hide_tr_nilt_sett) (* T3 *) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI, simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s' ^^ t''" in spec, simp) apply (subgoal_tac "noTick t''") apply (simp add: appt_assoc) apply (simp add: noTick_def) apply (force) apply (auto simp add: hide_tr_Tick_sett) done (*** Hiding_domF ***) lemma Hiding_domF : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> (traces(P -- X) (fstF o M), failures(P -- X) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Hiding_T2) apply (simp add: Hiding_F3) apply (simp add: Hiding_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Renaming | *--------------------------------*) (*** T2 ***) lemma Renaming_T2 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T2 (traces(P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures(P [[r]]) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) by (force) (*** F3 ***) lemma Renaming_F3 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_F3 (traces(P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures(P [[r]]) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI, simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="[[r]]inv X" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="[[r]]inv Y" in spec) apply (drule mp) apply (simp add: ren_tr_noTick_right) apply (intro allI impI) apply (simp add: ren_inv_def) apply (erule bexE) apply (fold ren_inv_def) apply (drule_tac x="eb" in spec, simp) (* Tick *) apply (erule disjE) apply (drule_tac x=" sa ^^ <a>" in spec) apply (simp add: ren_tr_noTick_right) (* Ev *) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (drule_tac x=" sa ^^ <Ev aa>" in spec) apply (simp add: ren_tr_noTick_right) by (simp) (* T3_F4 *) lemma Renaming_T3_F4 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures(P [[r]]) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp add: ren_tr_appt_decompo) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (case_tac "~ noTick s1", simp) apply (simp) (* F4 *) apply (rule conjI) apply (rule_tac x="s1" in exI, simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F4_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s1" in spec, simp) apply (rule memF_F2, simp, simp) (* T3 *) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac x="s1 ^^ <Tick>" in exI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T3_def) apply (fast) done (*** Renaming_domF ***) lemma Renaming_domF : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> (traces(P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures(P [[r]]) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Renaming_T2) apply (simp add: Renaming_F3) apply (simp add: Renaming_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Seq_compo | *--------------------------------*) (*** T2 ***) lemma Seq_compo_T2 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T2 (traces(P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures(P ;; Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI) apply (rule conjI) (* case 1 *) apply (intro impI) apply (rule disjI1) apply (rule_tac x="s" in exI, simp) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (force) (* case 2 *) apply (intro impI) apply (elim conjE exE disjE) apply (rule disjI2) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="t" in exI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (rotate_tac 4) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (force) done (*** F3 ***) lemma Seq_compo_F3 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_F3 (traces(P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures(P ;; Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE disjE) (* case 1 *) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="insert Tick X" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Y-{Tick}" in spec) apply (simp) apply (drule mp) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec, simp) apply (simp add: not_Tick_to_Ev) apply (elim conjE exE, simp) apply (rotate_tac -3) apply (drule_tac x="s ^^ <Ev aa>" in spec, simp) apply (subgoal_tac "insert Tick (X Un (Y - {Tick})) = insert Tick (X Un Y)", simp) apply (force) (* case 2 *) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (rotate_tac -2) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="X" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Y" in spec) apply (simp) apply (drule mp) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec, simp) apply (elim conjE) apply (rotate_tac -1) apply (drule_tac x="sa" in spec) apply (rotate_tac -1) apply (drule_tac x="t ^^ <a>" in spec) apply (simp add: appt_assoc) apply (rule disjI2) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="t" in exI) apply (simp) done (* T3_F4 *) lemma Seq_compo_T3_F4 : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures(P ;; Q) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE disjE) (* case 1 *) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (subgoal_tac "noTick (s ^^ <Tick>) ~= noTick (rmTick sa)", simp) apply (simp (no_asm_use)) apply (drule sym) apply (simp) (* case 2 *) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (case_tac "~ noTick sa", simp) apply (insert trace_last_nil_or_unnil) apply (drule_tac x="t" in spec) apply (simp) (* <> *) apply (erule disjE) apply (rotate_tac -5) apply (drule_tac sym, simp) (* contradict *) (* ... <Tick> *) apply (elim conjE exE, simp) apply (simp add: appt_assoc_sym) apply (erule conjE) apply (rule conjI) (* F4 *) apply (rule disjI2) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="sb" in exI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F4_def) (* T3 *) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac x="sa" in exI) apply (rule_tac x="t" in exI) apply (simp add: appt_assoc_sym domF_def HC_T3_def) done (*** Seq_compo_domF ***) lemma Seq_compo_domF : "[| (traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ; (traces(Q) (fstF o M), failures(Q) M) : domF |] ==> (traces(P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures(P ;; Q) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Seq_compo_T2) apply (simp add: Seq_compo_F3) apply (simp add: Seq_compo_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Depth_rest | *--------------------------------*) (*** T2 ***) lemma Depth_rest_T2 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T2 (traces(P |. n) (fstF o M), failures(P |. n) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T2_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) by (force) (*** F3 ***) lemma Depth_rest_F3 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_F3 (traces(P |. n) (fstF o M), failures(P |. n) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F3_def) apply (elim conjE) apply (drule_tac x="s" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="X" in spec) apply (drule_tac x="Y" in spec) apply (simp) apply (erule disjE) apply (simp) apply (simp) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp) done (* T3_F4 *) lemma Depth_rest_T3_F4 : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> HC_T3_F4 (traces(P |. n) (fstF o M), failures(P |. n) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp) (* F4 *) apply (rule conjI) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_F4_def) (* T3 *) apply (simp add: domF_def HC_T3_def) apply (case_tac "Suc (lengtht s) < n") apply (simp) apply (simp) apply (fast) done (*** Depth_rest_domF ***) lemma Depth_rest_domF : "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF ==> (traces(P |. n) (fstF o M), failures(P |. n) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Depth_rest_T2) apply (simp add: Depth_rest_F3) apply (simp add: Depth_rest_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | Proc_name_dom | *--------------------------------*) (*** T2 ***) lemma Proc_name_T2 : "HC_T2 (traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (elim exE) apply (simp add: pairF_domF_T2) done (*** F3 ***) lemma Proc_name_F3 : "HC_F3 (traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M)" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (simp add: pairF_domF_F3) done (* T3_F4 *) lemma Proc_name_T3_F4 : "HC_T3_F4 (traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M)" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def in_traces in_failures) apply (intro allI impI) apply (simp add: pairF_domF_T3) apply (simp add: pairF_domF_F4) done (*** Proc_name_domF ***) lemma Proc_name_domF : "(traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: Proc_name_T2) apply (simp add: Proc_name_F3) apply (simp add: Proc_name_T3_F4) done (*--------------------------------* | proc | *--------------------------------*) declare o_apply [simp del] lemma proc_domF[simp]: "(traces(P) (fstF o M), failures(P) M) : domF" apply (induct_tac P) apply (simp add: STOP_domF) apply (simp add: SKIP_domF) apply (simp add: DIV_domF) apply (simp add: Act_prefix_domF) apply (simp add: Ext_pre_choice_domF) apply (simp add: Ext_choice_domF) apply (simp add: Int_choice_domF) apply (simp add: Rep_int_choice_domF) apply (simp add: IF_domF) apply (simp add: Parallel_domF) apply (simp add: Hiding_domF) apply (simp add: Renaming_domF) apply (simp add: Seq_compo_domF) apply (simp add: Depth_rest_domF) apply (simp add: Proc_name_domF) done declare o_apply [simp] (*--------------------------------* | fstF sndF | *--------------------------------*) lemma fstF_proc_domF[simp]: "fstF (traces(P) (fstF o M),, failures(P) M) = traces(P) (fstF o M)" by (simp add: pairF) lemma sndF_proc_domF[simp]: "sndF (traces(P) (fstF o M),, failures(P) M) = failures(P) M" by (simp add: pairF) lemma fstF_proc_domF2[simp]: "fstF (traces(P) (%x. fstF (M x)),, failures(P) M) = traces(P) (fstF o M)" apply (fold comp_def) apply (simp) done lemma sndF_proc_domF2[simp]: "sndF (traces(P) (%x. fstF (M x)),, failures(P) M) = failures(P) M" apply (fold comp_def) apply (simp) done lemma fstF_proc_domF_fun: "fstF o (%p. (traces(f p) (fstF o M),, failures(f p) M)) = (%p. traces(f p) (fstF o M))" apply (unfold comp_def) apply (fold comp_def) apply (simp add: expand_fun_eq) done lemma sndF_proc_domF_fun: "sndF o (%p. (traces(f p) (fstF o M),, failures(f p) M)) = (%p. failures(f p) M)" apply (unfold comp_def) apply (fold comp_def) apply (simp add: expand_fun_eq) done lemma fstF_semFf[simp]: "fstF ([[P]]Ff M) = traces(P) (fstF o M)" by (simp add: semFf_def) lemma fstF_semF[simp]: "fstF ([[P]]F) = traces(P) (fstF o MF)" by (simp add: semF_def) lemma sndF_semFf[simp]: "sndF ([[P]]Ff M) = failures(P) M" by (simp add: semFf_def) lemma sndF_semF[simp]: "sndF ([[P]]F) = failures(P) MF" by (simp add: semF_def) (*** decomposition ***) lemma semFf_decompo: "([[P]]Ff M = SF) = ((traces P (fstF o M) = fstF SF) & failures P M = sndF SF)" apply (simp add: semFf_def) apply (rule) apply (drule sym) apply (simp) apply (simp) done lemma semF_decompo: "([[P]]F = SF) = ((traces P (fstF o MF) = fstF SF) & failures P MF = sndF SF)" apply (simp add: semF_def) apply (simp add: semFf_decompo) done lemma semFf_decompo_fstF: "([[P]]Ff M = SF) ==> traces P (fstF o M) = fstF SF" by (simp add: semFf_decompo) lemma semF_decompo_fstF: "([[P]]F = SF) ==> traces P (fstF o MF) = fstF SF" by (simp add: semF_decompo) lemma semFf_decompo_sndF: "([[P]]Ff M = SF) ==> failures P M = sndF SF" by (simp add: semFf_decompo) lemma semF_decompo_sndF: "([[P]]F = SF) ==> failures P MF = sndF SF" by (simp add: semF_decompo) (*--------------------------------* | [[$p]]Ff | *--------------------------------*) lemma semFf_Proc_name: "[[$p]]Ff = (%M. M p)" apply (simp add: semFf_def) apply (simp add: traces_def) apply (simp add: failures_def) done (*--------------------------------* | =F and <=F | *--------------------------------*) lemma cspF_eqF_semantics: "(P =F[M1,M2] Q) = ((traces P (fstF o M1) = traces Q (fstF o M2)) & (failures P M1 = failures Q M2))" apply (simp add: eqF_def) apply (simp add: semFf_def) apply (simp add: eqF_decompo) done lemma cspF_refF_semantics: "(P <=F[M1,M2] Q) = ((traces Q (fstF o M2) <= traces P (fstF o M1)) & (failures Q M2 <= failures P M1))" apply (simp add: refF_def) apply (simp add: semFf_def) apply (simp add: subdomF_decompo) done lemmas cspF_semantics = cspF_eqF_semantics cspF_refF_semantics lemma cspF_cspT_eqF_semantics: "(P =F[M1,M2] Q) = ((P =T[fstF o M1,fstF o M2] Q) & (failures P M1 = failures Q M2))" apply (simp add: cspF_eqF_semantics) apply (simp add: eqT_def) apply (simp add: semTf_def) done lemma cspF_cspT_refF_semantics: "(P <=F[M1,M2] Q) = ((P <=T[fstF o M1,fstF o M2] Q) & (failures Q M2 <= failures P M1))" apply (simp add: cspF_refF_semantics) apply (simp add: refT_def) apply (simp add: semTf_def) done lemmas cspF_cspT_semantics = cspF_cspT_eqF_semantics cspF_cspT_refF_semantics (*--------------------------------* | Timeout | *--------------------------------*) lemma in_failures_Timeout1: "(f :f failures(P [> Q) M) = (f :f failures(Q) M | (EX s X. f = (s, X) & s ~= <> & (s, X) :f failures(P) M) | (EX X. f = (<>, X) & X <= Evset & <Tick> :t traces(P) (fstF o M)))" apply (rule) (* <= *) apply (simp add: in_failures) apply (elim conjE exE disjE) apply (simp_all) apply (simp add: in_traces) apply (rule disjI1) apply (rule domF_F2_F4, simp_all) (* <= *) apply (simp add: in_failures in_traces) apply (elim conjE exE disjE, simp_all) apply (auto elim: memF_pairE) done lemma in_failures_Timeout2: "(f :f failures(P [>def Q) M) = (f :f failures(Q) M | (EX s X. f = (s, X) & s ~= <> & (s, X) :f failures(P) M) | (EX X. f = (<>, X) & X <= Evset & <Tick> :t traces(P) (fstF o M)))" apply (simp add: Timeout_def) apply (simp add: in_failures_Timeout1) done lemmas in_failures_Timeout = in_failures_Timeout1 in_failures_Timeout2 (*--------------------------------* | Depth rest | *--------------------------------*) lemma semFf_Depth_rest: "[[P |. n]]Ff M = [[P]]Ff M .|. n" apply (simp add: semFf_def) apply (simp add: traces.simps) apply (simp add: failures.simps) apply (simp add: rest_domF_def) apply (simp add: restTF_def) apply (simp add: pairF_def) apply (simp add: Abs_domF_inverse) apply (simp add: pair_restriction_def) done lemma semF_Depth_rest: "[[P |. n]]F = [[P]]F .|. n" apply (simp add: semF_def) apply (simp add: semFf_Depth_rest) done (*---------------------------------------------------* | Healthiness conditions for proc | *---------------------------------------------------*) lemma proc_T2: "(s, X) :f failures(P) M ==> s :t traces(P) (fstF o M)" apply (insert pairF_domF_T2[of "s" "X" "(traces(P) (fstF o M),, failures(P) M)"]) by (simp) lemma proc_T3: "[| s ^^ <Tick> :t traces(P) (fstF o M); noTick s |] ==> (s ^^ <Tick>, X) :f failures(P) M" apply (insert pairF_domF_T3[of "s" "(traces(P) (fstF o M),, failures(P) M)" "X"]) by (simp) lemma proc_T3_Tick: "<Tick> :t traces(P) (fstF o M) ==> (<Tick>, X) :f failures(P) M" apply (insert proc_T3[of "<>" P M X]) by (simp) lemma proc_F4: "[| s ^^ <Tick> :t traces(P) (fstF o M) ; noTick s |] ==> (s, Evset) :f failures(P) M" apply (insert pairF_domF_F4[of "s" "(traces(P) (fstF o M),, failures(P) M)"]) by (simp) lemma proc_F3: "[| (s, X) :f failures(P) M ; noTick s ; (ALL a. a : Y --> s ^^ <a> ~:t traces(P) (fstF o M)) |] ==> (s, X Un Y) :f failures(P) M" apply (insert pairF_domF_F3[of "s" "X" "(traces(P) (fstF o M),, failures(P) M)" "Y"]) by (simp) lemma proc_F3I: "[| (s, X) :f failures(P) M ; noTick s ; (ALL a. a : Y --> s ^^ <a> ~:t traces(P) (fstF o M)) ; Z = X Un Y |] ==> (s, Z) :f failures(P) M" by (simp add: proc_F3) (*** F2_F4 ***) lemma proc_F2_F4: "[| s ^^ <Tick> :t traces(P) (fstF o M) ; noTick s ; X <= Evset|] ==> (s, X) :f failures(P) M" apply (insert pairF_domF_F2_F4[of "s" "(traces(P) (fstF o M),, failures(P) M)" "X"]) by (simp) (*** T2_T3 ***) lemma proc_T2_T3: "[| (s ^^ <Tick>, X) :f failures(P) M ; noTick s |] ==> (s ^^ <Tick>, Y) :f failures(P) M" apply (rule proc_T3) apply (rule proc_T2) by (simp_all) (*------------------------------------------------------* | Union in domF (used for generic internal choice | *------------------------------------------------------*) lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_T2: "Ps ~= {} ==> HC_T2 (UnionT {(traces P (fstF o M)) |P. P : Ps} , UnionF {(failures P M) |P. P : Ps})" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (subgoal_tac "{(traces P (fstF o M)) |P. P : Ps} ~= {}") apply (simp) apply (elim conjE bexE exE) apply (simp) apply (rule_tac x="traces Pa (fstF o M)" in exI) apply (rule conjI) apply (rule_tac x="Pa" in exI) apply (simp) apply (simp add: proc_T2) by (auto) lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_F3: "Ps ~= {} ==> HC_F3 (UnionT {(traces P (fstF o M)) |P. P : Ps} , UnionF {(failures P M) |P. P : Ps})" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (subgoal_tac "{(traces P (fstF o M)) |P. P : Ps} ~= {}") apply (simp) apply (elim conjE exE) apply (simp) apply (rule_tac x="failures Pa M" in exI) apply (rule conjI) apply (rule_tac x="Pa" in exI) apply (simp) apply (rule proc_F3) apply (simp_all) apply (intro allI impI) apply (drule_tac x="a" in spec) apply (simp) apply (drule_tac x="traces Pa (fstF o M)" in spec) apply (erule disjE) apply (drule_tac x="Pa" in spec) apply (simp) apply (simp) apply (auto) done lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_T3_F4: "Ps ~= {} ==> HC_T3_F4 (UnionT {(traces P (fstF o M)) |P. P : Ps} , UnionF {(failures P M) |P. P : Ps})" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (subgoal_tac "{(traces P (fstF o M)) |P. P : Ps} ~= {}") apply (simp) apply (elim conjE bexE exE) apply (simp) apply (rule conjI) apply (rule_tac x="failures Pa M" in exI) apply (rule conjI) apply (fast) apply (rule proc_F4) apply (simp_all) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac x="failures Pa M" in exI) apply (rule conjI) apply (fast) apply (rule proc_T3) apply (simp_all) by (auto) lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_domF: "Ps ~= {} ==> (UnionT {(traces P (fstF o M)) |P. P : Ps} , UnionF {(failures P M) |P. P : Ps}) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_T2) apply (simp add: non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_F3) apply (simp add: non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_T3_F4) done (*------------------------------------------------------* | Union in domF (used for generic internal choice | *------------------------------------------------------*) lemma UnionT_UnionF_T2: "HC_T2 ({t. t = <> | (EX P:Ps. t :t traces(P) (fstF o M)) }t , {f. EX P:Ps. f :f failures(P) M}f )" apply (simp add: HC_T2_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (simp add: in_traces_Union_proc) apply (simp add: in_failures_Union_proc) apply (elim conjE bexE exE) apply (rule disjI2) apply (rule_tac x="P" in bexI) apply (simp add: proc_T2) apply (simp) done lemma UnionT_UnionF_F3: "HC_F3 ({t. t = <> | (EX P:Ps. t :t traces(P) (fstF o M)) }t , {f. EX P:Ps. f :f failures(P) M}f )" apply (simp add: HC_F3_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (simp add: in_traces_Union_proc) apply (simp add: in_failures_Union_proc) apply (elim conjE bexE exE) apply (simp) apply (rule_tac x="P" in bexI) apply (rule proc_F3) apply (simp_all) done lemma UnionT_UnionF_T3_F4: "HC_T3_F4 ({t. t = <> | (EX P:Ps. t :t traces(P) (fstF o M)) }t , {f. EX P:Ps. f :f failures(P) M}f )" apply (simp add: HC_T3_F4_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (simp add: in_traces_Union_proc) apply (simp add: in_failures_Union_proc) apply (elim conjE bexE exE) apply (simp) apply (elim bexE) apply (rule conjI) apply (rule_tac x="P" in bexI) apply (rule proc_F4) apply (simp_all) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac x="P" in bexI) apply (rule proc_T3) apply (simp_all) done lemma UnionT_UnionF_domF: "({t. t = <> | (EX P:Ps. t :t traces(P) (fstF o M)) }t , {f. EX P:Ps. f :f failures(P) M}f) : domF" apply (simp (no_asm) add: domF_iff) apply (simp add: UnionT_UnionF_T2) apply (simp add: UnionT_UnionF_F3) apply (simp add: UnionT_UnionF_T3_F4) done (*-----------------------------------------* | substitution | *-----------------------------------------*) lemma semF_subst: "[[P<<f]]F = [[P]]Ff (%q. [[f q]]F)" apply (induct_tac P) apply (simp add: semF_def semFf_def, simp add: eqF_decompo, simp add: traces_def failures_def)+ done lemma semF_subst_semFfun: "(%q. [[ (Pf q)<<f ]]F) = ([[Pf]]Ffun (%q. [[f q]]F))" apply (simp add: semFfun_def) apply (simp add: expand_fun_eq) apply (rule allI) apply (simp add: semF_subst) done lemma failrues_subst: "failures(P<<f) M = failures P (%q. [[f q]]Ff M)" apply (induct_tac P) apply (simp_all add: semF_def semFf_def traces_def failures_def)+ apply (simp add: fstF_proc_domF_fun) apply (simp add: traces_subst) apply (simp add: fstF_proc_domF_fun) apply (simp add: traces_subst) done (*-----------------------------------------* | semT -- semF | *-----------------------------------------*) lemma semTfun_fstF_semFf: "[[Pf]]Tfun (fstF o M) p = fstF ([[Pf p]]Ff M)" apply (simp add: semTfun_def) apply (simp add: semTf_def) done (****************** to add them again ******************) declare disj_not1 [simp] end
lemma STOP_T2:
HC_T2 (traces STOP (fstF o M), failures STOP M)
lemma STOP_F3:
HC_F3 (traces STOP (fstF o M), failures STOP M)
lemma STOP_T3_F4:
HC_T3_F4 (traces STOP (fstF o M), failures STOP M)
lemma STOP_domF:
(traces STOP (fstF o M), failures STOP M) ∈ domF
lemma SKIP_T2:
HC_T2 (traces SKIP (fstF o M), failures SKIP M)
lemma SKIP_F3:
HC_F3 (traces SKIP (fstF o M), failures SKIP M)
lemma SKIP_T3_F4:
HC_T3_F4 (traces SKIP (fstF o M), failures SKIP M)
lemma SKIP_domF:
(traces SKIP (fstF o M), failures SKIP M) ∈ domF
lemma DIV_T2:
HC_T2 (traces DIV (fstF o M), failures DIV M)
lemma DIV_F3:
HC_F3 (traces DIV (fstF o M), failures DIV M)
lemma DIV_T3_F4:
HC_T3_F4 (traces DIV (fstF o M), failures DIV M)
lemma DIV_domF:
(traces DIV (fstF o M), failures DIV M) ∈ domF
lemma Act_prefix_T2:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T2 (traces (a -> P) (fstF o M), failures (a -> P) M)
lemma Act_prefix_F3:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_F3 (traces (a -> P) (fstF o M), failures (a -> P) M)
lemma Act_prefix_T3_F4:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (a -> P) (fstF o M), failures (a -> P) M)
lemma Act_prefix_domF:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> (traces (a -> P) (fstF o M), failures (a -> P) M) ∈ domF
lemma Ext_pre_choice_T2:
∀a. (traces (Pf a) (fstF o M), failures (Pf a) M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T2 (traces (? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures (? :X -> Pf) M)
lemma Ext_pre_choice_F3:
∀a. (traces (Pf a) (fstF o M), failures (Pf a) M) ∈ domF
==> HC_F3 (traces (? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures (? :X -> Pf) M)
lemma Ext_pre_choice_T3_F4:
∀a. (traces (Pf a) (fstF o M), failures (Pf a) M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures (? :X -> Pf) M)
lemma Ext_pre_choice_domF:
∀a. (traces (Pf a) (fstF o M), failures (Pf a) M) ∈ domF
==> (traces (? :X -> Pf) (fstF o M), failures (? :X -> Pf) M) ∈ domF
lemma Ext_choice_T2:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T2 (traces (P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures (P [+] Q) M)
lemma Ext_choice_F3:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_F3 (traces (P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures (P [+] Q) M)
lemma Ext_choice_T3_F4:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures (P [+] Q) M)
lemma Ext_choice_domF:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> (traces (P [+] Q) (fstF o M), failures (P [+] Q) M) ∈ domF
lemma Int_choice_T2:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T2 (traces (P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |~| Q) M)
lemma Int_choice_F3:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_F3 (traces (P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |~| Q) M)
lemma Int_choice_T3_F4:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |~| Q) M)
lemma Int_choice_domF:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> (traces (P |~| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |~| Q) M) ∈ domF
lemma Union_proc_T2:
∀c. (Tf c, Ff c) ∈ domF
==> HC_T2 ({t. t = <> ∨ (∃c∈C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. ∃c∈C. f :f Ff c}f)
lemma Rep_int_choice_T2:
∀c. (traces (Pf c) (fstF o M), failures (Pf c) M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T2 (traces (!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures (!! :C .. Pf) M)
lemma Union_proc_F3:
∀c. (Tf c, Ff c) ∈ domF
==> HC_F3 ({t. t = <> ∨ (∃c∈C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. ∃c∈C. f :f Ff c}f)
lemma Rep_int_choice_nat:
∀c. (traces (Pf c) (fstF o M), failures (Pf c) M) ∈ domF
==> HC_F3 (traces (!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures (!! :C .. Pf) M)
lemma Union_proc_T3_F4:
∀c. (Tf c, Ff c) ∈ domF
==> HC_T3_F4 ({t. t = <> ∨ (∃c∈C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. ∃c∈C. f :f Ff c}f)
lemma Rep_int_choice_T3_F4:
∀c. (traces (Pf c) (fstF o M), failures (Pf c) M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures (!! :C .. Pf) M)
lemma Union_proc_domF:
∀c. (Tf c, Ff c) ∈ domF
==> ({t. t = <> ∨ (∃c∈C. t :t Tf c)}t, {f. ∃c∈C. f :f Ff c}f) ∈ domF
lemma Rep_int_choice_domF:
∀c. (traces (Pf c) (fstF o M), failures (Pf c) M) ∈ domF
==> (traces (!! :C .. Pf) (fstF o M), failures (!! :C .. Pf) M) ∈ domF
lemma IF_T2:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T2
(traces (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M)
lemma IF_F3:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_F3
(traces (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M)
lemma IF_T3_F4:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T3_F4
(traces (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M)
lemma IF_domF:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> (traces (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) (fstF o M), failures (IF b THEN P ELSE Q) M)
∈ domF
lemma Parallel_T2:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T2 (traces (P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |[X]| Q) M)
lemma Parallel_F3_lm1:
X1.0 ∪ (X2.0 ∪ X3.0) - X = X1.0 - X ∪ (X2.0 - X) ∪ (X3.0 - X)
lemma Parallel_F3_lm2:
[| X1.0 = X2.0; Y1.0 = Y2.0 |] ==> X1.0 ∪ Y1.0 = X2.0 ∪ Y2.0
lemma Parallel_F3:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_F3 (traces (P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |[X]| Q) M)
lemma Parallel_T3_F4:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |[X]| Q) M)
lemma Parallel_domF:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> (traces (P |[X]| Q) (fstF o M), failures (P |[X]| Q) M) ∈ domF
lemma Hiding_T2:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T2 (traces (P -- X) (fstF o M), failures (P -- X) M)
lemma Hiding_F3:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_F3 (traces (P -- X) (fstF o M), failures (P -- X) M)
lemma Hiding_T3_F4:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (P -- X) (fstF o M), failures (P -- X) M)
lemma Hiding_domF:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> (traces (P -- X) (fstF o M), failures (P -- X) M) ∈ domF
lemma Renaming_T2:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T2 (traces (P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures (P [[r]]) M)
lemma Renaming_F3:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_F3 (traces (P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures (P [[r]]) M)
lemma Renaming_T3_F4:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures (P [[r]]) M)
lemma Renaming_domF:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> (traces (P [[r]]) (fstF o M), failures (P [[r]]) M) ∈ domF
lemma Seq_compo_T2:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T2 (traces (P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures (P ;; Q) M)
lemma Seq_compo_F3:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_F3 (traces (P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures (P ;; Q) M)
lemma Seq_compo_T3_F4:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures (P ;; Q) M)
lemma Seq_compo_domF:
[| (traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF;
(traces Q (fstF o M), failures Q M) ∈ domF |]
==> (traces (P ;; Q) (fstF o M), failures (P ;; Q) M) ∈ domF
lemma Depth_rest_T2:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T2 (traces (P |. n) (fstF o M), failures (P |. n) M)
lemma Depth_rest_F3:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_F3 (traces (P |. n) (fstF o M), failures (P |. n) M)
lemma Depth_rest_T3_F4:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> HC_T3_F4 (traces (P |. n) (fstF o M), failures (P |. n) M)
lemma Depth_rest_domF:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
==> (traces (P |. n) (fstF o M), failures (P |. n) M) ∈ domF
lemma Proc_name_T2:
HC_T2 (traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M)
lemma Proc_name_F3:
HC_F3 (traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M)
lemma Proc_name_T3_F4:
HC_T3_F4 (traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M)
lemma Proc_name_domF:
(traces ($p) (fstF o M), failures ($p) M) ∈ domF
lemma proc_domF:
(traces P (fstF o M), failures P M) ∈ domF
lemma fstF_proc_domF:
fstF (traces P (fstF o M) ,, failures P M) = traces P (fstF o M)
lemma sndF_proc_domF:
sndF (traces P (fstF o M) ,, failures P M) = failures P M
lemma fstF_proc_domF2:
fstF (traces P (λx. fstF (M x)) ,, failures P M) = traces P (fstF o M)
lemma sndF_proc_domF2:
sndF (traces P (λx. fstF (M x)) ,, failures P M) = failures P M
lemma fstF_proc_domF_fun:
fstF o (λp. (traces (f p) (fstF o M) ,, failures (f p) M)) =
(λp. traces (f p) (fstF o M))
lemma sndF_proc_domF_fun:
sndF o (λp. (traces (f p) (fstF o M) ,, failures (f p) M)) =
(λp. failures (f p) M)
lemma fstF_semFf:
fstF ([[P]]Ff M) = traces P (fstF o M)
lemma fstF_semF:
fstF [[P]]F = traces P (fstF o MF)
lemma sndF_semFf:
sndF ([[P]]Ff M) = failures P M
lemma sndF_semF:
sndF [[P]]F = failures P MF
lemma semFf_decompo:
([[P]]Ff M = SF) = (traces P (fstF o M) = fstF SF ∧ failures P M = sndF SF)
lemma semF_decompo:
([[P]]F = SF) = (traces P (fstF o MF) = fstF SF ∧ failures P MF = sndF SF)
lemma semFf_decompo_fstF:
[[P]]Ff M = SF ==> traces P (fstF o M) = fstF SF
lemma semF_decompo_fstF:
[[P]]F = SF ==> traces P (fstF o MF) = fstF SF
lemma semFf_decompo_sndF:
[[P]]Ff M = SF ==> failures P M = sndF SF
lemma semF_decompo_sndF:
[[P]]F = SF ==> failures P MF = sndF SF
lemma semFf_Proc_name:
[[$p]]Ff = (λM. M p)
lemma cspF_eqF_semantics:
(P =F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(traces P (fstF o M1.0) = traces Q (fstF o M2.0) ∧
failures P M1.0 = failures Q M2.0)
lemma cspF_refF_semantics:
(P <=F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(traces Q (fstF o M2.0) ≤ traces P (fstF o M1.0) ∧
failures Q M2.0 ≤ failures P M1.0)
lemma cspF_semantics:
(P =F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(traces P (fstF o M1.0) = traces Q (fstF o M2.0) ∧
failures P M1.0 = failures Q M2.0)
(P <=F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(traces Q (fstF o M2.0) ≤ traces P (fstF o M1.0) ∧
failures Q M2.0 ≤ failures P M1.0)
lemma cspF_cspT_eqF_semantics:
(P =F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(P =T[fstF o M1.0,fstF o M2.0] Q ∧ failures P M1.0 = failures Q M2.0)
lemma cspF_cspT_refF_semantics:
(P <=F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(P <=T[fstF o M1.0,fstF o M2.0] Q ∧ failures Q M2.0 ≤ failures P M1.0)
lemma cspF_cspT_semantics:
(P =F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(P =T[fstF o M1.0,fstF o M2.0] Q ∧ failures P M1.0 = failures Q M2.0)
(P <=F[M1.0,M2.0] Q) =
(P <=T[fstF o M1.0,fstF o M2.0] Q ∧ failures Q M2.0 ≤ failures P M1.0)
lemma in_failures_Timeout1:
(f :f failures (P [> Q) M) =
(f :f failures Q M ∨
(∃s X. f = (s, X) ∧ s ≠ <> ∧ (s, X) :f failures P M) ∨
(∃X. f = (<>, X) ∧ X ⊆ Evset ∧ <Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M)))
lemma in_failures_Timeout2:
(f :f failures (P [>def Q) M) =
(f :f failures Q M ∨
(∃s X. f = (s, X) ∧ s ≠ <> ∧ (s, X) :f failures P M) ∨
(∃X. f = (<>, X) ∧ X ⊆ Evset ∧ <Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M)))
lemma in_failures_Timeout:
(f :f failures (P [> Q) M) =
(f :f failures Q M ∨
(∃s X. f = (s, X) ∧ s ≠ <> ∧ (s, X) :f failures P M) ∨
(∃X. f = (<>, X) ∧ X ⊆ Evset ∧ <Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M)))
(f :f failures (P [>def Q) M) =
(f :f failures Q M ∨
(∃s X. f = (s, X) ∧ s ≠ <> ∧ (s, X) :f failures P M) ∨
(∃X. f = (<>, X) ∧ X ⊆ Evset ∧ <Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M)))
lemma semFf_Depth_rest:
[[P |. n]]Ff M = [[P]]Ff M .|. n
lemma semF_Depth_rest:
[[P |. n]]F = [[P]]F .|. n
lemma proc_T2:
(s, X) :f failures P M ==> s :t traces P (fstF o M)
lemma proc_T3:
[| s ^^ <Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M); noTick s |]
==> (s ^^ <Tick>, X) :f failures P M
lemma proc_T3_Tick:
<Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M) ==> (<Tick>, X) :f failures P M
lemma proc_F4:
[| s ^^ <Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M); noTick s |]
==> (s, Evset) :f failures P M
lemma proc_F3:
[| (s, X) :f failures P M; noTick s;
∀a. a ∈ Y --> s ^^ <a> ~:t traces P (fstF o M) |]
==> (s, X ∪ Y) :f failures P M
lemma proc_F3I:
[| (s, X) :f failures P M; noTick s;
∀a. a ∈ Y --> s ^^ <a> ~:t traces P (fstF o M); Z = X ∪ Y |]
==> (s, Z) :f failures P M
lemma proc_F2_F4:
[| s ^^ <Tick> :t traces P (fstF o M); noTick s; X ⊆ Evset |]
==> (s, X) :f failures P M
lemma proc_T2_T3:
[| (s ^^ <Tick>, X) :f failures P M; noTick s |]
==> (s ^^ <Tick>, Y) :f failures P M
lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_T2:
Ps ≠ {}
==> HC_T2
(UnionT {traces P (fstF o M) |P. P ∈ Ps}, UnionF {failures P M |P. P ∈ Ps})
lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_F3:
Ps ≠ {}
==> HC_F3
(UnionT {traces P (fstF o M) |P. P ∈ Ps}, UnionF {failures P M |P. P ∈ Ps})
lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_T3_F4:
Ps ≠ {}
==> HC_T3_F4
(UnionT {traces P (fstF o M) |P. P ∈ Ps}, UnionF {failures P M |P. P ∈ Ps})
lemma non_empty_UnionT_UnionF_domF:
Ps ≠ {}
==> (UnionT {traces P (fstF o M) |P. P ∈ Ps}, UnionF {failures P M |P. P ∈ Ps})
∈ domF
lemma UnionT_UnionF_T2:
HC_T2
({t. t = <> ∨ (∃P∈Ps. t :t traces P (fstF o M))}t,
{f. ∃P∈Ps. f :f failures P M}f)
lemma UnionT_UnionF_F3:
HC_F3
({t. t = <> ∨ (∃P∈Ps. t :t traces P (fstF o M))}t,
{f. ∃P∈Ps. f :f failures P M}f)
lemma UnionT_UnionF_T3_F4:
HC_T3_F4
({t. t = <> ∨ (∃P∈Ps. t :t traces P (fstF o M))}t,
{f. ∃P∈Ps. f :f failures P M}f)
lemma UnionT_UnionF_domF:
({t. t = <> ∨ (∃P∈Ps. t :t traces P (fstF o M))}t,
{f. ∃P∈Ps. f :f failures P M}f)
∈ domF
lemma semF_subst:
[[P << f]]F = [[P]]Ff (λq. [[f q]]F)
lemma semF_subst_semFfun:
(λq. [[(Pf q) << f]]F) = [[Pf]]Ffun (λq. [[f q]]F)
lemma failrues_subst:
failures (P << f) M = failures P (λq. [[f q]]Ff M)
lemma semTfun_fstF_semFf:
[[Pf]]Tfun (fstF o M) p = fstF ([[Pf p]]Ff M)